Feedback
Editorial
Special
Report
Update
Tribute
Newscan
Observatory
Essay
Ethos
Breaking
Barriers
Voices
Home
Back to sabrang.com
Archives
See what's in?
Subscriptions
Subscribe to CC
Advertising
Want to Advertise in CC
Sabrang
Team
Meet those talented people of Sabrang
Our Activities
Activities carried out by Sabrang
Letters to Editor
Send your letters to the Editors
Contact
Us
Umh!, Whats this? |
Editorial / January 2001
War of words
If the verbal barrage let loose by
the hotheads of Hindutva in December is anything to go by, it would
seem that the saffron brigade is preparing for another holy war.
“Muslims are a threat to nation” thunders Bal Thackeray, while the Vishwa
Hindu Parishad chief Ashok Singhal readily agrees with the Shiv Sena
supremo that Indian Muslims should be disenfranchised. If this is
not open incitement to communal ha tred, what is? But the BJP president,
Prime Minister Vajpayee’s Laxman sees no need to comment on these
“personal views” of his political ally — at the Centre and in Maharashtra.
Over 5,000 thousands sadhus will march from Ayodhya to Parliament House
to demand that the government return the land it took away so that construction
of the Ram Temple can begin, declares Singhal. Who cares about Vajpayee’s
year-end musing that none will be allowed to defile the law of the land?
Meanwhile, the Akhil Bhartiya Sahasampark
Pramukh of the RSS, Dr Shripati Shastri, issues an open threat at a public
gathering where sarsanghchalak KS Sudarshan and the VHP chief Ashok Singhal
are also present: “No minority can be safe in any country by constantly
irritating the majority community.” One only needs to rephrase the proposition
to catch the full import of Shastri’s words: As Muslims and Christians
are constantly irritating the Hindu majority in India, they cannot expect
to remain safe. Did Hitler complain about the Jewish minority “constantly
irritating” the German majority?
Words, ominous words. Concerning
Muslims and Ayodhya, Christians and conversions and the foreign missionaries-dominated
non-Swadeshi Church that is “a threat to Indian security” (See pgs 28-29).
Flowing so thick and fast that it is difficult to keep track of this volley
of words, from one day to the next, from one leader to the other. It suits
the Prime Minister and it suits Bangaru Laxman to ignore them. But the
minorities being targeted and all those concerned with the future of Indian
democracy and its Constitution can ill-afford to ignore the dark clouds
gathering on our horizon.
It is a matter of no less concern
that jehadis patronised by the Pakistani establishment are contributing
handsomely to the building climate of intolerance in the country. When
mercenaries masquerading as soldiers of Allah killed innocent Hindu pilgrims
in Pahalgam last August, Muslims from Gujarat had to bear the brunt of
the “Hindu retaliation”. The daring assault on the Red Fort by a suicide
squad of the Lashkar-i-Taiba and their subsequent threat that the Prime
Minister of India is their next target are provocative in the extreme.
Considering that the words ‘Muslim’ and ‘Pakistani’ are so easily interchangeable
in the saffron lexicon, the sangh parivar can revert to the chant of a
1,000-year-old war between Islam and Hinduism at any moment of its choosing,
just as they did at the time of the Kargil war. In fact, Thackeray is already
saying it in so many words.
The votaries of Hindutva claim to
speak in the name of the nation, which to them is synonymous with Hindus.
But does the renewed saffron belligerence correspond to the sentiment on
the ground; does it reflect the prevailing “national sentiment”? Apparently
not. An opinion poll conducted by ORG-MARG for India Today magazine conducted
in the last week of December indicates that if an election were to be held
to the Lok Sabha now, the strength of the BJP-led NDA alliance will go
down from the present 304 to anything between 252-268 in a house of 543.
Taken together, 52 per cent of the respondents felt rising prices, farmers’
woes and unemployment should be on top of the government’s agenda against
the 14 per cent who saw Ayodhya as the most important issue before the
country.
What does one make of the resurgent
stridency of Hindutva amidst the declining appeal of the BJP-led government?
Two hard-line arguments are possible from a saffron perspective: One, militant
Hindutva is what took the BJP from its two seats in the Lok Sabha to the
180 seats now? Ek dhakka aur do, for the next quantum leap. Second, Hindutva
seeks power for the pursuit of its ideological agenda. Of what use is shared
power if it implies the very sacrifice of ideology? What else can you feed
kar sevaks who have been nurtured on hate? There is of course the more
pragmatic argument: Assembly elections are round the corner in several
states and since the BJP and the sangh parivar have nothing else to offer
to the voters, why not try its USP? Whether its ideology or realpolitik
that fuels Hindutva resurgent virulence, the portents for the country and
its minorities are ominous.
— EDITORS
|