Communalism Combat
Khoj
Aman
Doc. Center
Feedback
Editorial
Special Report
Update
Tribute
Newscan
Observatory
Essay
Ethos
Breaking Barriers
Voices
 

Home
Back to sabrang.com

Archives
See what's in?

Subscriptions
Subscribe to CC

Advertising
Want to Advertise in CC

Sabrang Team
Meet those talented people of Sabrang

Our Activities
Activities carried out by Sabrang

Letters to Editor
Send your letters to the Editors

Contact Us
Umh!, Whats this?

Dalit Drishti /  February  2001

'The traditional leadership has prvented Muslims from focussing on substantial issues such as educational advancement and economic and social progress'

In recent years, the traditional Muslim leadership has frequently demanded reservations for the Muslim com munity as a solution to its increas ing backwardness. This demand, however, has been opposed by various segments of Indian society. Secularists are critical of the demand on the principle that religion cannot ever be the basis of affirmative action in a secular society. They also argue that pushing this demand will only accentuate communal sentiments in an already communalised society. Votaries of Hindutva, too, are fiercely opposed to reservation for Muslims. What is less known is the fact that the representatives of the lower castes among the theoretically ‘casteless’ Muslim society also vehemently oppose religion as a basis for reservations.

Dr Ejaz Ali is national convenor of the All–India Backward Muslim Morcha (AIBMM), set up in 1994 as an umbrella group of over 40 Backward Caste Muslim organisations. Here he talks to Yoginder Sikand about the work of the movement that he leads.

Q: You have coined the term ‘Dalit Muslim’. What exactly do you mean by it?

A: Almost all Muslims in India are descendants of local converts. Our ancestors did not come from Arabia. They were locals who converted to Islam. One could categorise them into two broad groups. Firstly, Dalits who converted to Islam en masse, to escape from caste oppression under the Brahminical order. They were visibly impressed by the simplicity and brotherhood of the early Muslims, especially the Sufis. They saw them eating together from the same vessel, praying together shoulder–to–shoulder in the same mosque. All this visibly impressed them and they converted in large numbers to Islam in search of equality and self–respect. Their descendants form the overwhelming majority of the present Indian Muslim population. These are the Dalit Muslims.

The other Muslims in India are descendants, either of Muslims who came to the country over the centuries from Iran, Central Arabia or Iran, or of local converts from ‘high’ caste Hindu families or else from the groups collectively known today as the Other Backward Castes. They form only a small minority of the Indian Muslim community.

Q: Why have you set up a separate organisation for Dalit Muslims?

A: Despite their conversion to Islam, the social, economic and educational status of the Dalit Muslims remains pathetic. And the traditional Muslim leadership has ignored their real problems.

Q: What are the aims and objectives of the AIBMM?

A: We have, at present, a one–point agenda — to undo the injustice that is being done to the Dalit Muslims by the unfair laws that have been promulgated denying them their rights. Under the Government of India Act of 1935, a list or schedule was drawn up of castes which were recognised as extremely backward. These were the scheduled castes. They included castes which were considered Hindu, Muslim, animist, Christian and Sikh. Some of these castes, such as Dhobi (washermen), Mochi (cobblers) and Halalkhor (sweepers), had both Hindu as well as Muslim members. Special provisions were made for their social and economic uplift.

However, in 1950 a Presidential Order was passed according to which these special benefits would be restricted only to those Scheduled Castes who professed to be Hindu. Accordingly, an amendment was made to Article 341 of the Constitution of India. We are struggling to have the Presidential Order rescinded so that all Dalits, irrespective of religion, enjoy the same benefits. In 1956, Article 341 was amended to extend the same benefits that Hindu Dalits enjoy to Sikh Dalits. In 1990 this was extended to the neo–Buddhists, too. If these communities can enjoy Scheduled Caste status despite belonging to theoretically egalitarian religions, then why not Dalit Muslims and Dalit Christians?

Q: On what grounds have you sought to challenge the present law?

A: The Constitution declares India to be a secular country, where all people have the freedom of religion and enjoy equality in the eyes of the law. If reservations are given only to Hindu Dalits but not to Muslim Dalits, although their socio–economic conditions may be identical, is this not a gross violation of the very basic premises of the Constitution ?

Under the law as it stands today, if a Dalit Christian or Muslim converts to Hinduism he is automatically entitled to special benefits, but if a Dalit Hindu changes his religion and accepts Christianity or Islam, he loses such benefits at once. What is this but an inducement for Dalit

Muslims and Christians to accept Hinduism, and a threat of punishment to Dalit Hindus seeking to convert to other religions in search of social equality?

Q: Dalit Muslims and Christians have been included by the Mandal Commission Report in the category of Other Backward Castes (OBCs). Why then are you insisting that they be put in the Scheduled Caste category instead?

A: Under Mandal, two categories of Muslims have been included as OBCs. The first are the Dalit Muslims, descendants of ‘untouchable’ converts to Islam. The other category, which is far smaller in number, consists of the Muslim counterparts of social groups among Hindus recognised as OBCs, such as vegetable growers, milkmen and so on. We would like the former category to be recognised as Scheduled Castes instead of OBCs, as is the case at present.

There are two reasons for this. Firstly, because presently the OBCs are only given limited benefits. On the other hand, the Scheduled Castes are provided not just job reservations, but also political reservations in state legislatures and the Parliament, and facilities such as housing schemes, interest–free loans, special courts to try cases of atrocities against them and so on. As a result of these benefits, the Hindu Dalits have been able to make a considerable headway, leaving the Dalit Muslims lagging far behind them.

Secondly, by placing the Dalit Muslims in the same category as economically, socially and educationally far more powerful and advanced Hindu and Muslim OBCs, they have been put at a considerable disadvantage. Little wonder then that it is these powerful groups who are cornering all the advantages from the limited implementation of the recommendations of the Mandal Commission Report, while the Dalit Muslims have gained almost nothing from it.

Q: Some Muslim leaders have accused you of attempting to promote division and casteism among Muslims in the name of Dalit Muslim rights. What do you have to say about this?

A: How can one say that recognising the existence of Dalit Muslims will introduce the venom of casteism in Muslim society? After all, such castes already exist. The Mandal Commission Report recognised this and provided for certain benefits for Dalit and Backward Caste Muslims, but this did not lead to any increase in caste feelings among Muslims. So, how can the mere shifting of the Dalit Muslims from the OBC to the Scheduled Caste category add to the problem of caste division?

In fact, by providing special facilities for the Dalit Muslims they will be able to come up in life and once that happens inter–caste marriages between Dalit and other Muslims would begin to take place and slowly the caste system among Muslims would begin to disintegrate.

Q: Some Muslim leaders have countered your demand for reservation for Dalit Muslims by putting forward the demand that reservations be made for Muslims as a whole. What is your position on this?

A: We are opposed to reservations for Muslims as a community. The Indian Constitution itself prohibits reservations on a communal basis and provides for reservations only for socially and educationally backward sections. Besides, demands for reservations for Muslims as a whole will only further strengthen inter-communal antagonisms. And if introduced the benefits would accrue to economically and educationally better–off Muslims, not the Dalit Muslims, who form the vast majority of the Muslim population and who need such benefits the most.

Q: Has the Muslim leadership been supportive of your struggle?

A: The idea of setting up the AIBMM stemmed partially from a recognition of the complete failure of the traditional Muslim leadership. By getting involved in sensational issues such as the preservation of the minority character of the Aligarh Muslim University, Urdu, Muslim Personal Law or Babri Masjid, Muslims were prevented from focussing on substantial issues such as educational advancement and economic and social progress. In this the Hindutva forces, which do not want to see Muslims progress, and the traditional Muslim leadership, which wants to maintain its hegemony and control over the community, seem to be acting in tandem with each other.

We do not say that the Babri Masjid issue or that of Muslim Personal Law is to be ignored, but these are secondary. What is of primary concern to the Dalit Muslims is their very survival and this must be tackled first before we can turn our attention elsewhere.

Q: Do you see the AIBMM playing any role in promoting communal harmony?

A: It is a fact that in any riot situation, it is the Dalits, irrespective of religion, particularly Dalit Muslims, who suffer the most. The Dalits are made to attack and kill each other in the name of religion. We thus see communalism as a basic issue which the Dalit Muslim movement has to deal with. If all Dalits unite we can insist that real, substantial, bread–and–butter issues are made the agenda of Indian politics, not issues of Mandir–Masjid that have caused such havoc.

Hence, we in the AIBMM have placed the highest importance in building bridges with non–Muslim Dalit groups, such as Ambedkarite neo–Buddhists and Dalit Christians. We now have branches in seven states — Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Delhi, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Andhra Pradesh. And in all these states we are working in tandem with other, non–Muslim Dalit groups who are very supportive of our cause.

— Dr. Hedieh Mirahmadi

 

Communalism Combat
Khoj
Aman
Doc. Center

© Copyright Sabrang Communication & Publishing Pvt. Ltd.