July
7, 2005
The Times of
India
Let’s Call the Ulema’s Bluff
Muslims must stand up for women’s
rights
By Javed Anand
We Muslims proudly proclaim that Islam
is the only religion that from its very inception gave justice,
honour and dignity to women. But from the spate of fatwas in the
recent past, it is obvious that the high priests of Islam remain a
bastion of male supremacy. Among educated Muslim circles today, you
frequently hear the refrain: “ Our ulema have made us laughing stock
before the world”. But drawing conversations are no longer adequate.
We must either stop parroting the boost about Islam treating gender
justice or publicly challenge the outdated, outmoded worldview of
our ulema.
In September last year, Gudiya from
Meerut district made frontpage news. She had got married to an army
jawan, Mohammad Arif, in 1999. soon after, Arif went missing from
his posting and was declared a deserter. After waiting for him for
four years, Gudiya remarried another man Taufeeq. In the midst of
her pregnancy, news came that Arif was no deserter but was in
Pakistan jail. Released from imprisonment, he returned home only to
find his wife had remarried and was pregnant.
What was Gudiya to do? Nobody asked her
that question. The local panchayat decided that she belonged to her
first husband while her unborn child would go to Taufeeq. Through TV
debates and other media, Islamic scholars and the ulemas endorsed
the panchayat’s decision as being in accordance with Islamic
principles, no one bothered about Gudiya.
In June this year, the Darul Uloom
Deoband, pronounced that Imrana, a woman from Muzaffarnagar who had
allegedly been raped by her father-in-law Ali Mohammad, was no
longer lawful to her husband, Noor Ilahi. In short, Imrana was asked
to pay for the crime committed by her father-in-law. Around the week
ago, the same seminary issued another fatwa proclaiming that Muslim
women must ideally not contest panchayat elections, and never
without a veil. In other words, the venerable maulana wants people
to elect as their representative a woman whose face they must not
see, before or after the polls.
But the latest pearls of wisdom have
emanated from the 130-year-old Jamia Nizamia, Hyderabad. Mufti
Mohammad Azeemuddin of this respected institute issued a fatwa early
this month saying that no only is it perfectly fine for a Muslim
male to have four wives, he can marry all of them at one go.
Relying on the fatwa Qazi Muhammad Abdul
Wahid Qureshi married off two teenage girls from Hyderabad, Farheen
Sultana and Hina Sultana, to a 45-year-old Arab from the UAE in a
single sitting on August 1.
Isn’t it an offence to solemnise a
marriage before the age of 18? Even in self-proclaimed Islamic
stated today there is a clearly defined legal bar on the minimum age
for marriage. The ulema, however, inhabit a world of their own. At
is national meet in Hyderabad in late 2002, the All India Muslim
personal Law Board (AIMPLB) had demanded that Muslims be exempted
from the provisions of the Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929.
But for some spoilsport journalist who
ruined the show, Al-Rahman Ismael Mirza Abdu Jabbar could have
enjoyed marital bliss for a few months, weeks or days maybe, used
triple talaq to instantly divorce his current wives and start all
over again with a fresh batch of teenage Muslim girls. This is
nothing but flesh trade with ‘Islamic’ sanction. Yet, I am willing
to bet my last rupee that a fatwa cold easily be obtained from JAmia
Nizamia or any other centre of high Islamic learning to pronounce
such obnoxious pratice “bad in theology but good under Islamic vew”.
For far too long, the AIMPLB, a
non-elected and non-representative body dominated by ulema who
subscribe to the Hanafi school of Islamic jurisprudence has
functioned as a Muslim male club. In the last year or so, some
Muslim women have launched a rival personal law board and are openly
challenging the AIMPLB. A few months ago a young Muslim activists
tore to shreds the worthless ‘model nikhanama’ that had just been
adopted by the AIMPLB with much fanfare. In Tamil Nadu, a Muslim
women’s group is setting up a separate jamaatkhana for women.
Muslim women are now voting with their
feet. We must ask ourselves why rather than turning to Muslim men,
many of these groups actively seek the support and solidarity with
secular, non-denominational women’s organizations. Shariat courts
are now in the news and the Supreme Court wants an explanation from
AIMPLB, the Darul Uloom and others. Attempts are afoot to drum up
support for these wonderful institutions that deliver cheap and
quick justice in a country notorious for judicial delays. Mubai’s
notorious don Vardharaj Mudaliar and the Shiv Sena supreme Bal
Thackeray are also also known to dispense speedy justice. Why not
wind up all courts than and parcel out the dispensation of justice
to such speedy deliverers? The choice is ours to make. It needs to
be made now and the choice is simple: Islam or the ulema?
The writer is co-editor, Communalism
Combat