Asylum for ‘adultery’ accused
I n a path–breaking step, the British House of Lords ruled
last month that since they collectively suffer persecution from men, Pakistani
women who become outcasts in their society after being accused of adultery can
seek asylum in Britain. The ruling came on the plea of two Pakistani women
living in London after being driven into exile by false accusations. Syeda Shah,
43, fled to Britain in 1992 with her child after her husband named her as an
adulteress. Shahana Islam, 45, a former Pakistani schoolteacher, fled after a
militant political group began spreading rumours that she was unfaithful to her
husband. Both drew the attention of the Lords to the fact that Pakistan’s
Islamic law classifies zina (adultery) as a criminal offence that is
punishable by imprisonment, public flogging or stoning.
The two women, who were supported by the United Nations High
Commissioner for Refugees, argued that they were legitimate refugees under the
definition contained in the UN Convention on Refugees of 1951. Ms. Shah and Ms.
Islam argued that they had good reason to fear persecution as a member of a
particular social group, namely women, who experience discrimination and
oppression because they are treated as inferior to men in Pakistani society.
The Lords accepted their argument by a majority of four to one.
Hannana Siddiqui, from the Southall Black Sisters, described the verdict as
"enlightened". She said: "We have many other women who have suffered similarly
and we hope that they will now be given the protection of British asylum law."
Pro–White bias in Canadian wages
R recent study published in the Canadian Review of
Sociology and Anthropology revealed that visible minorities in Canada faced a
"startling" level of wage discrimination. David Ralph Mathews and his PhD
student, Jasson Lian, of the University of British Columbia, used 1991 census
figures and found that non–Whites earned less at every educational level
compared to their similarly educated White counterparts. The study concluded
that the pay discrimination against visible minorities indicated that Canada,
despite its vaunted multi–cultural policies, is a "racist society" when it comes
to paying people for the work they do. "There’s equality of opportunity in
Canada but inequality of results", Mathews said. He added, "We have a sort of a
liberal presumption that education protects one from discrimination. That
doesn’t seem to be the case. This study suggests we have a pattern of
discrimination that is incredibly thorough. It flies in the face of how we
regard ourselves as Canadians."
The study analysed the case of 4,25,107 Canadians and found that
people of European origin doing identical work with the same level of education
received the same wages. Contrary to the general perception, no difference was
found between pay scales of French and British Canadians. But a statistically
significant income difference was found when visible minorities were compared to
the French and British Canadians. The study, however, was unable to conclude
whether this was direct discrimination or whether other factors were
responsible. But it did assert that discrimination pervaded every ethnic group.
Those of Asian, African and Latin American descent earned less than White
Canadians in nine out of ten educational categories. South Asians earned 6.8 per
cent less than White Canadians.
Mathews remarked, "We pride ourselves on being
non-discriminatory compared with other countries and especially with other high-industrialised
countries. We need to look at our assumptions of equality".
Japan whitewashes its history
J udging by the history taught in its schools, Japanese
society seems keen to hide the unsavoury aspects of its own past from coming
generations. Christopher Barnard, associate professor at Teikyo University, who
has recently completed a linguistic study of 88 school history text–books, found
a consistent ideological bias running through all but a few. The texts usually
shirk the blame for wartime atrocities such committed by the Japanese such as
the Nanjing massacre. Since the education ministry vets all text-books, Barnard
believes the Japanese government is directly responsible for refusing to take
responsibility for the past actions of Japan or the wartime Japanese government.
The study revealed that the Nanjing massacre was usually cloaked in the passive
voice and facts were presented so as to downplay the incident. Besides Nanjing,
there is no record in these textbooks of Japan attacking another country during
the Second World War. The attack on Pearl Harbour in 1941 is ascribed to Japan
in only half of the textbooks.
Saudi woman sues Viagra
V iagra may be the source of sexual bliss for some. But, as
this story from Saudi Arabia shows, it could also be the source of serious
marital conflict. A woman has sued the distributor of the anti-impotency drug
claiming that her husband’s desire to marry a second woman after long years in
wedlock has everything to do with his taking the ‘wonder pill’. The woman
complained to an Islamic court in north-western Saudi Arabia that she had been
her husband’s only wife for 35 years and it was not until he started taking the
blue pill that he wanted to marry a second woman. The woman demanded
compensation from Viagra’s distributor in Saudi Arabia and pleaded that the
judge stops her husband from taking the drug and block his moves to marry a
younger woman. The judge ruled that Islam allowed the man to take up to four
wives, so long as they were all treated equally. But he also made the man
promise not to pop the problem pill unless a Muslim doctor prescribed it to him!
The right to her name
W omen in Thailand are claiming the right to retain their
maiden names and recent developments suggest that they may soon succeed. In
mid-June, Prime Minister Chuan Leekpai’s office put forward a proposal for a new
law that would meet this demand for gender parity. Thai women’s groups have been
pushing for the passage of such a law for some years but the demand has faced
opposition from the country’s powerful interior ministry and the council of
state. These bodies have argued that the bill may weaken family unity since it
may lead to disagreements between spouses as to whose name the child should
adopt. They also claim that the child may feel alienated from the parent with
whom he does not share his name. In the face of such opposition, the network for
Women and the Constitution, a coalition of women’s and civil rights groups,
plans a campaign to gain support for their demand from members of the
Parliament.
Rs. 59 lakh for an ‘Islamic’ scarf!
F ifty-nine lakhs is certainly a lot of rupees for a single
scarf. But if you happen to be as rich as you are religious, what’s cash before
faith? Meet Maryam bint Ali bin Sultan al-Ali, daughter of a Qatari businessman,
who thought nothing of offering U.S. $ 137,000 for the head scarf that cost a
leader of the Turkish Islamist party her seat in parliament as also her
citizenship. On May 2, the newly-elected 31-year-old Merve Kavakci turned up for
the swearing-in ceremony to the Parliament wearing her Islamic headscarf, a
garment that is banned in educational institutions and public offices by Turkish
law. While offering the disqualified parliamentarian a hefty sum of money, Ms.
Maryam said the scarf was precious as it had become a ‘symbol of Shariah’.
‘False start’ for goodwill ambassador
F ormer Spice Girl Geri Hallywell began her inaugural tour
as a United Nations ambassador of goodwill, but her visit to the Philippines ran
smack into opposition from the country’s powerful church. ‘I believe that if you
can’t control your fertility, you can’t control your life, and if you’re having
sex, you’ve got to be protected against unwanted pregnancy and infection,"
Halliwell, 27, told reporters yesterday after a visit to a slum community in
Manila. |