Pockets of resistance
BY MUKESH SEMWAL
The Maharaja Sayajirao University (MSU) in Vadodara,
Gujarat, is amongst the top universities in the country with a global
reputation. MSU’s Fine Arts College is reputed nationally and
internationally for upholding the highest standards of creative and
critical practice. It is also reputed for its commitment to the freedom of
expression. Last month, however, this prestigious institute hit the
headlines as one more target of police-supported Hindutva hooligans in
Modi state where the rule of law is an alien concept.
On May 9, 2007 the saffron brigade, led by an advocate,
Niraj Jain, stormed the university premises. The cause of their misplaced
rage was a painting by Chandra Mohan, a student from the graphics
department of the fine arts college in Vadodara, which was part of a
collection of students’ paintings displayed for assessment by examiners
for a master’s degree in fine arts. Mohan’s painting, depicting nude
figures with some religious motifs, allegedly hurt "Hindu religious
sentiments". This was enough for the self-appointed moral police to barge
into the campus, disrupt the annual examinations in progress and beat
Mohan up.
What is even more shocking is the role of the police.
Instead of taking action against the lawbreakers, the police promptly
arrested the unfortunate student and charged him under various sections of
the Indian Penal Code (section 153 – Promoting enmity between different
groups on grounds of religion, etc, section 114 – Abettor present when
offence is committed, section 295 A – Deliberate and malicious acts
intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its
religion or religious beliefs). They opposed his being given bail and had
him locked up in Vadodara’s Central Jail for five days. As if that was not
enough, the vice chancellor (VC) of MSU, Dr Manoj Soni, was party to the
ugly episode. Instead of upholding the dignity of his university, speaking
up for Chandra Mohan and demanding police action against Niraj Jain and
his hoodlums, Soni chose to suspend the dean of the fine arts faculty,
Prof Shivaji Panikkar.
Freedom of the arts and literature are vital in any
democracy. There may be divergent views on this sensitive issue.
Accredited artists of high calibre, refinement and culture are those fit
to comment on works of art. What constitutes beauty and what is obscenity
cannot be decided by a self-constituted moral brigade. The way the
exhibition was displayed by students of the fine arts faculty establishes
that it was clearly meant for academic evaluation in the annual
examination.
The exhibition was ransacked by the saffron brigade with
the help of the police armed with a magistrate’s order. Such an action
within the precincts of an academic institution of high repute, under the
nose of the VC and the university’s administrative authority, is
unthinkable. Right-thinking persons across the country have been appalled
by this fascist act and have come out openly in solidarity with the
protesting students and faculty of the MSU. Within Gujarat and, in
particular, amongst teachers and students of MSU, the latest incident is
being seen as part of a concerted attempt by the sangh parivar to subvert
the autonomy of institutes of higher learning and to bring them under
saffron sway.
The process, started when the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
assumed power in the state some 10 years ago, only accelerated after the
2002 carnage. Though a similar communalisation of the campus has been
under way in other universities in Gujarat, a vibrant struggle has emerged
within the MSU to challenge it. Against all odds, both teachers and
students at MSU are resisting the nefarious plan to destroy their powers
of resistance and to trample on the autonomy of MSU and thus pave the way
for absolute control of the university by the Hindutva brigade.
In a way, this phenomenon is part of the two-decade old
effort by different political parties across the country to undermine the
autonomy of universities following the National Policy of Education, 1986
coupled with directives of GATT and the WTO. Be it the Congress party in
states where they are in power, or the CPI (M)-led Left government in West
Bengal and Kerala, most political parties, ‘national’ or ‘regional’, are
uncomfortable with genuine autonomy for universities.
Far from being the exception, the previous National
Democratic Alliance government at the Centre and the Modi-led BJP
government in Gujarat have aggressively intensified the process. They have
not only appointed puppets as vice chancellors but taken the exercise many
steps further by actively choosing those committed to the sangh parivar’s
hate politics for these critical and prestigious posts.
The result of such blatant attempts at academic control by
politicians and political parties has resulted in syllabi being redesigned
with a view to shun the rational and scientific outlook and doctor young
minds. In a nutshell, the democratisation of education has been severely
arrested.
The unchallenged practice by all political parties to
control institutions has made the BJP’s job even easier. Whenever it comes
to power the BJP uses these unhealthy precedents, albeit more
aggressively. Wherever it is in control of state governments, the sangh
parivar, in its bid to universalise Hindutva ideology, is going for all
out saffronisation even as it destroys the very fabric of democratic,
secular and scientific education.
Pre-planned vandalism of May 2007
The marauders chose examination time for their assault on
the Fine Arts College with the objective of rousing communal passions in
Vadodara. The faculty was targeted because its students and teachers had
dared to stand up to the puppet vice chancellor, Manoj Soni. The backdrop
to the incident was the earlier uncalled for thrashing of a student from
the arts faculty by a security guard at the instance of a hostel warden.
Strong protests from students of the faculty, backed by their dean, Prof
Shivaji Panikkar, left the atmosphere within MSU smouldering. Clearly the
VC is out to teach this independent faculty a lesson.
Systematic saffronisation
Following the 2002 carnage, the MSU was brought totally
under the control of the BJP and its mentor group, the Rashtriya
Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). In 2003 the University Syndicate, the highest
decision-making body which formulates rules and regulations in the
university, was completely in the grip of the sangh parivar. For the first
time in the history of MSU, there was no voice of dissent at any of the
syndicate meetings. Many non-academics and persons of low calibre were
made senate members by the Gujarat government. The academic year 2003-04
sounded the death knell for MSU as various anti-student, anti-education
measures were taken by university authorities.
Only those with unflinching loyalty to sangh ideology
could climb the ladder of academic success. After the 2002 carnage, most
of the VCs appointed to various universities in Gujarat owed their
allegiance to the ruling party. The current VC, Dr Soni was rewarded with
this post for praising Modi and eulogising the carnage. The university
magazine of the arts faculty was not allowed to publish a resolution
condemning the communal carnage. Nor was there was any official
condemnation on the murderous attack on Prof Jussar Bandukwala, a senior
faculty member of the MSU, during the 2002 violence.
The atmosphere of free debate, discussion and democratic
dissent has been vitiated by the saffron brigade for some time now. In
2003, activists of the BJP’s youth wing, Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi
Parishad (ABVP), destroyed placards against the US invasion of Iraq put up
by the all-India Democratic Students’ Organisation (DSO). In September
2002, RSS syndicate members and ABVP activists stalled a seminar sponsored
by the University Grants Commission and organised by the department of
history, where Islamic scholar, Asghar Ali Engineer, was scheduled to be
the main speaker.
In 2003, DSO was denied permission to organise a cultural
festival in the fine arts faculty hall even though non-university related
organisations, including religious bodies, are regularly permitted to hold
their functions there. The DSO was being thwarted because it had led two
successful student agitations resulting in the emergence of a genuine
students’ movement in MSU.
The ‘hostel movement’ in 2004 was a big blow to saffron
forces. In June 2004, when students were leaving after exams were over,
the University Syndicate arbitrarily decided to close down two boys’
hostels: Lal Bahadur Shastri (LBS) Hall and Manubhai Mehta (MM) Hall. It
also introduced some major changes in the hostel administration, including
the centralisation of power in the hands of the chief warden. Being a
residential university, MSU has 12 boys’ hostels and four girls’ hostels.
These hostels can accommodate only 3,500 students, which is inadequate for
the existing strength of students.
DSO launched a movement against the closure of the
hostels. The authorities had to give in to students’ demands after
students’ gheraoed the VC for about eight hours on August 15, 2004.
This was the first time in years that the BJP/RSS syndicate was compelled
to bend before a democratic movement.
MSU under Soni
MSU’s current VC, Manoj Soni, is a former student of the
university. Previously a reader in the political science department of
Sardar Patel University, Anand, he took over as VC of MSU on April 17,
2005. What surprised many was the appointment of such an inexperienced
person to manage such a prestigious institution. Ironically, he would have
been content with the post of reader in the political science department
at MSU.
Soni’s proximity to Modi was one of the factors
responsible in catapulting him to the top post. He is understood to be the
brain behind the draft of the Common University Act, an enactment intended
to destroy the autonomy of universities. He is the youngest VC that MSU
has had. While the BJP/RSS lobby loves him, those who oppose the Common
University Act see him as a man specially brought in by the Modi
government to prepare the ground for the implementation of the Common
University Act.
After taking over as VC in April 2005, Soni briefly tried
to cultivate the image of a popular student-friendly VC. But the pretence
did not last long. Barely three months later, he sat on hunger strike in
the company of BJP/RSS leaders opposing a students’ agitation. What came
as a shock to many in the MSU was the brutal use of force against
agitating students on July 18, 2005 in the VC’s presence. Instead of
intervening, Dr Soni said, "They were shouting for justice, and justice
has been given to them."
The Common University Act (CUA) was a draconian move by
the state government to bring all universities in the state under tighter
political and bureaucratic government control. A successful agitation
launched jointly by teachers and students prevented the Act’s
implementation. However, Soni is already imposing provisions of the CUA
indirectly – by victimising students, punishing members of the teaching
faculty and interfering in the day-to-day academic affairs of various
faculties. He is trampling on academic freedom and the autonomy of the
university, blatantly trying to let university affairs be run from
Gandhinagar. This was evident during the recent incident at the fine arts
faculty of MSU and especially given the antecedents of many who stormed
its gates.
The student community has played an important role in
various movements to safeguard university autonomy and oppose the
anti-education polices of university authorities and the state government.
To gag this rising students’ voice, MSU authorities banned the students’
election in 2005-06. A Students’ Action Committee then launched a movement
against this step. Elections were held a year later, in 2006, in an
extremely tense and repressive atmosphere.
That year, the VC’s anti-student attitude was once again
on display, this time during the agitation for admissions to the master of
arts’ history course when some female students lay down in protest outside
the VC’s office. Instead of hearing their pleas, Soni simply walked over
the agitating students! Ultimately, the protest movement succeeded but the
VC’s arrogance shocked all right-thinking persons in Vadodara.
As with students, so with the teaching staff. University
teachers are routinely tempted by the lure of postings, promotions and
positions if they toe the saffron line. Hostel wardens are also selected
on the basis of their pro-RSS leanings. RSS shakhas (branch
meetings) are freely allowed on the university campus.
A woman teacher in the home science faculty was denied a
promotion because of the growing communalism in MSU’s administration. She
has since filed a case in the Gujarat High court stating that because she,
a Hindu, is married to a Muslim, she was made a victim of communal bias.
Prof Bharat Mehta, a reader in the department of Gujarati literature, has
also been denied promotion because of his secular credentials. Mehta has
screened films on the Gujarat carnage and been active in debunking saffron
propaganda about the Godhra incident and the post-Godhra genocide.
Today the autonomy of MSU is in grave danger. The VC, Soni,
is out to saffronise it. The saffron brigade wants to generate a
controversy around Chandra Mohan’s paintings and never mind the question
of artistic freedom. "Hurting religious sentiments" is but a clever ploy
used to divert attention from their true object: the issue of autonomy.
Arousing people’s religious passions would of course fulfil a dual purpose
and reap rich political dividends before assembly elections in the state.
Hence all efforts need to be concentrated on supporting
the struggle by students and teachers to ensure the autonomy of MSU. The
saffron brigade and the ABVP are out to confuse and divide the
university’s students. While Congress (I)’s student wing, the National
Students Union of India, is also playing a short-sighted and divisive
role.
(Mukesh Semwal is a research scholar, Department of
Political Science, MSU, and Gujarat State President, All India Democratic
Students’ Organisation –DSO.)
|
Intrusion of intolerance
This meeting of the executive council of Jadavpur
University notes with deep concern and shock the recent events at the MS
University of Baroda which included the arrest of a student without any
FIR or warrant, disruption of regular academic activities by police and
hooligans, the suspension of the dean of the faculty of fine arts by the
vice chancellor.
This meeting strongly condemns the intrusion of
intolerance in one of the most important institutes of the teaching of
the arts in India, in the name of protecting some misguided notion of
tradition. We record our support of the courageous stand of the dean of
the faculty of fine arts, Professor Shivaji Panikkar.
We condemn this and other similar events, which have
tried to vitiate the traditions of plurality, enquiry and
experimentation on academic campuses in India. We urge all academics,
students, artists and intellectuals to take an active role in ensuring
that certain fundamentalist individuals and groups
do not succeed in their efforts to stifle values enshrined in
democratic, artistic, academic and constitutional systems.
— Text of a resolution adopted by the executive council
of Jadavpur University at a meeting held on May 16, 2007
Condemn repression
The closure of the exhibition of students’ paintings in
the fine arts department of MS University, Baroda, by so-called
activists and the university authorities is highly condemnable. A
university is the promoter and torch bearer of freedom of thought and
expression. The vice chancellor of the university has committed
dereliction of his primary duty. India, all through the ages, has been
nurturing divergence of ideas, faith and actions. The actions of these
so-called Hindu activists are truly un-Indian. I express my solidarity
and support to the group which is spearheading the protest. Let us keep
on protesting till the authorities rescind their heinous actions.
— MS Thimmappa, Former vice chancellor, Bangalore
University
www.fineartsfaculty.blogspot.com
|
|